THE PRESIDENT CAN’T SEND A SENIOR MEMBER OF THE ADMINISTRATION TO ATTEND THATCHER FUNERAL, BECAUSE THEY’RE ALL BUSY TAKING YOUR GUNS

The funeral of Baroness Thatcher this Wednesday will be the biggest event happening in the world this week.  Across the globe, people will be watching, and representatives from many countries will be present (in some cases leaders themselves). 

Barack Obama will not send any senior member of his Administration to the funeral of Lady Thatcher, citing the phoney issue of 'gun-control' as the reason

Although nobody expected President Obama to attend, it was widely thought, both in the US and the UK, that he would send a senior member of his administration to represent him – perhaps the Vice President Joe Biden, or even his wife Michelle. 

However, it turns out they can’t make it, as they are very busy this week taking guns away from law-abiding citizens. 

The US embassy said that ‘this is a hugely significant week in terms of US domestic politics’.  The spokesman went on to say that both the First Lady and the Vice President were ‘the President’s point people on gun control’, adding: ‘This is a week when there is a lot of movement on Capitol Hill on gun control issues.’ 

Instead, the Reagan-era secretaries of state James Baker and George Schulz would represent the US. 

Of course, this might be a lot more appropriate.  It is, after all, better to have two people who actually appreciated Margaret Thatcher rather than a far-left celebrity of a president who would probably much rather be with the ill-mannered protesters dancing on her grave (if it were not for his current predicament) than mourning her death. 

Mrs. Thatcher was arguably President Ronald Reagan's
closest ally

Nevertheless, this is an embarrassing moment for the United States of America.  It is somehow unbelievable that Obama could not find *one* senior member of his administration to attend this *world event*.  It is a very careless handling of diplomacy on the president’s part and should make other countries wonder why he’s acted so carelessly.  He might hate the United Kingdom (he sent back the bust of Churchill the British gave the United States following the 9/11 attacks, and he opted for ‘neutrality’ over the Falklands dispute), but he really needs to put his petty ‘anti-imperialism’ aside.  One cannot simply snub other countries, particularly countries that are members of the G8.  The President should send someone to represent the Administration. 

But no, and why?  Because the Obama Administration is very busy this week trying to grab guns off innocent citizens.  I never knew that tearing up the Constitution was more important than mourning the death of a fighter for liberty.  

'RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS' RESPONSIBLE FOR BOSTON BOMBINGS, SAYS CNN NATIONAL SECURITY ANALYST [VIDEO INCLUDED]

I wondered how long it would take before the Boston Bombings became partisan.  It is amazing that such an event, in a civil society, can even take such a turn.  When people should stand united petty politics is still playing out.  Here’s what happened:

'RIGHT-WINGERS' might be responsible for the Boston
Bombings, says CNN contributor Peter Bergen

CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen told host Jake Tapper that the Boston explosions might be the work of Al Qaeda terrorists in as much a way as they might be the work of ‘right-wing extremists’.  Of course, because the streets are filled with those ‘right-wing extremists’ planting bombs, aren’t they?  And why ‘right-wing extremists’, could it perhaps be ‘left-wing extremists’ (after all, most revolutions and terrorist attacks of the last century have come from the Left). 

I need to make a point here.  When Bergen talks of ‘right-wingers’ I am assuming he means ‘conservatives’ (it would be the natural connection, particularly in the United States where ‘left’ and ‘right’ are so clearly defined).  But (and this is important) bombing, and other acts of terrorism, are by their very nature, very *un-conservative*.  Conservatism is a *reactionary* philosophy that developed following the French Revolution.  Conservatives of that time included the well-known Edmund Burke, who wrote in his book Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) ‘that men of intemperate minds cannot be free.  Their passions forge their fetters’.  In other words, revolution (and revolutionary behavior, such as bombing) is to be detested, for it can only have worse consequences.  Conservatives are *against* such acts.  This was why, equally, the Norwegian mass-murderer Anders Behring Breivik could not have been a ‘conservative’, as so many people, including the British Prime Minister David Cameron, kept suggesting.  For no real conservative would act like such a socialist revolutionary – no conservative would desire a revolution of any sort – in fact, revolution is the exact opposite of conservatism, as it does not seek to ‘conserve’ nor does it maintain the peace and encourage social stability.  

UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR: CONSERVATIVES ARE 'STUPID AND RACIST' AND SO MUCH MORE . . . AND SOME OTHER CASES

Have the Left colonized the educational establishment?  This writer thinks so. 

‘Professor’ Darry Sragow of the University of Southern California has been very busy making some eloquent and highly intellectually challenging points.  In fact, his thesis of the Republican Party and conservatism is so convoluted that one might want to stop reading if one does not have a PhD. 

LEFT WING LOONY-TOON 'Professor' Darry Sragow goes on
anti-GOP, anti-conservative rant in university

Is one ready for the stimulating analysis?  It echoes the poetry of Shakespeare, combined with the philosophy of Burke: 

“They’re really stupid and racist . . . The Republican Party is increasingly the last refuge of old, angry white people who don’t like what’s going on in this country”

Amazed by the ‘Professor’s’ genius, yet?  It gets even more academic (one might need a dictionary):

“Old white guys are stubborn suns of bitches.”

Masterful, isn’t it?  Well, not exactly.  You’d think this demagogue would at least be more articulate in his vicious lying, but I am not surprised of his rashness and fanaticism.  After all, over the last few weeks I’ve written several articles about similar events, occurring in schools and universities across America. 

On Thursday, 21 March 2013 I wrote about another ‘professor’ who told his students to ‘stomp on Jesus’.  You can read the article here: 

 http://rightwinghome.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-democrat-professor-who-made-his.html

On Friday, 22 March 2013 I wrote about the school performance of a pro-homosexual play that seeks to ridicule the Holy Bible.  You can read the article here: 

http://rightwinghome.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/adam-and-steve-and-lesbian-mary-more.html

On Saturday, 23 March 2013 I wrote about the university that invited a ‘businesswoman’ to come in and talk to students about the ‘huge benefits’ of being a porn star.  You can read the article here: 

http://rightwinghome.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/need-help-paying-off-your-student-loan.html

On Wednesday, 27 March 2013 I wrote about the school that banned the word ‘Easter’ because they thought it was offensive.  You can read the article here: 

http://rightwinghome.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/calm-down-lefty-its-only-egg.html

I have also been on the receiving end of ideological indoctrination in a school myself.  I was ruthlessly silenced by the Bigoted Woman in an inner city London sixth-form college in Islington simply because I stood up for tolerance and freedom.  You can read the article here: 

http://rightwinghome.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/i-was-bashed-by-left-wing-teacher-for.html

The Left might say that the students are free to challenge these morons, but in practice that is impossible, for most students (save myself) realize that doing so might narrow their chances of getting decent grades.  The high and mighty professors and staff run the show, and if the students don’t play along, they risk being given low grades, or even getting expelled (as I was). 

I am not even interested in rebutting the ‘Professor’s’ claims.  If you have a brain, you wouldn’t need to here any rebuttals, the statements speak for themselves. 

It seems clear to me that the Left has indeed hijacked education in the West, and they are turning out young men and women who will blindly follow their undesirable cause. 

I can only hope that, as these kids get older, they’ll see the light, and release themselves from the curse these fanatical Lefties have put on them. 

IN MEMORIAM: MARGARET THATCHER, 1925-2013

The death of Margaret Thatcher doesn’t end a chapter of British politics, that chapter had already ended with the destruction of the ‘Conservative’ Party following her downfall.  However, it is a sullen reminder of the fact that such a time has gone, that the last patriotic major politician in Great Britain has vanished. 

MARGARET THATCHER at the casket of former US President Ronald Reagan as he was laying in state in the Capitol Rotunda on Capitol Hill in Washington on June 9, 2004

Lady Thatcher died in the morning of the 8^th of April 2013, after suffering a stroke.  She was 87. 

During the 1970s Britain was crumbling.  Nationalization meant that the government effectively controlled the economy, the trade unions could easily hold the country to ransom (as they did), and only a few years earlier Britain had lost its Empire in Africa. 

But, by the beginning of the 1990s Britain was rich and prosperous.  Undoubtedly, Margaret Thatcher was responsible for a lot of great change in Britain. 

What makes Thatcher’s story all the more inspiring was not simply that she was a woman, but more that she was a woman who didn’t complain about the fact.  She jumped into a ‘man’s world’ and didn’t bang on about ‘inequality in the workforce’; she fought, and she won.  Unlike the Feminists, who want to disregard traditional female roles and deem them as ‘oppressive’, Thatcher used them, and even embraced them: ‘Any woman who understands the problems of running a home will be nearer to understanding the problems of running a country.’  Running a home!  The Feminists would flip. 

And it was that spirit of opportunity that she had – anybody could do anything regardless of class.  Her Left Wing haters attacked her for ‘rolling back the frontiers of socialism, and returning power to the people’ (her words, not mine).  They could not contemplate a world where the government did not control the means of production, where people could be on the property ladder, where individuals looked to themselves, and not the government. 

Indeed, one of the main reasons the Left (and the Labour Party) hated her was because she stole their vote.  People from America might not have heard of ‘Right To Buy’, but it allowed people living in social housing to buy their homes from their council at a discounted price.  The Labour Party opposed the move, and they flew the typical banner: that if council houses were sold, people would be sleeping in the streets. 

The real reason for their loathing of RTB, though, was that it took away a lot of their vote.  Labour, like other socialist parties, relied heavily on the poor to win elections.  They thrived in the ‘council estates’ where people who felt hopeless and useless voted for them with the wish of getting some welfare in return.  The Labour Party was happy to give handouts, what they could not do was *empower* those individuals to succeed and own property. 

           

What we should remember most of all was the disgraceful attack on her from the Conservative Party itself.  She had been one of Britain’s most successful leaders electorally.  She had revitalized the Tory Party (another name for the Conservative Party) and she had fixed the economic woe.  Still, her senior ministers stabbed her in the back, mainly over the Europe question, although many strangely believe it was the Poll Tax.  Alas, Margaret Thatcher became a ‘Euroskeptic’ a bit too late.  She realized, after having brought Britain closer to Europe than any other British politician, that the EU (back then the European Economic Community) wanted to destroy nation state democracy, and control the continent from remote institutions located in Brussels and Strasbourg.  Her Conservative Party cabinet did not share her new-founded contempt for this new movement, and so literally kicked her out of office – thus, Britain’s greatest post-war leader was gone, never to return. 

Today there are mixed feelings concerning Thatcher, but that is only because of the perception that she ‘hated’ the poor.  It is a similar story in the United States, where Republicans are often thought of as being representatives of the rich and powerful.  This is not true.  Conservatives believe that the poor can only combat poverty if they are given the opportunity to succeed, and to have that opportunity they must first be freed of the slavery of government dependence.  Thatcher believed this, and although she did not do much to reduce the size of the welfare state, she did give individuals the opportunity to become entrepreneurial. 

I may write about Mrs. Thatcher’s shutting down of various industries in the coming weeks, but for now I would like to join with the millions around the world, who are celebrating Margaret Thatcher’s achievements on both the domestic and international stage. 

May God bless Baroness Thatcher. 

THATCHER BASHING ALREADY STARTS ON TWITTER - A FEW TWEETS FROM COMMUNISTS

Lady Thatcher has only been dead a few hours, and already student/communist thugs are rejoicing like autistic emus.  Comment below and tell these loons how wrong they are! 

Sean Dogan ‪@Dogan1878

Follow

No one on here was alive when Hitler was around, you all hate him.  I'll hate Thatcher until I die, don't tell me what I can an can't do.

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

***************************************************

Free Communism ‪@AnarchistTheft

Follow

Great News Thatcher is dead!!! 

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

**************************************************

Brandon ‪@_Brandonnnx

Follow

Margaret thatcher fucked more minors than jimmy saville

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

**************************************************

Tom ‪@tomcope1994

Follow

I know it's harsh to laugh at the dead, but... HA! Fuck off Thatcher you stupid sack conservative shit.

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

******************************************************

LORD DJANGO ‪@MightyBeardo

Follow

RIP Margaret Thatcher, the Milk Snatcher

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

******************************************************

Ciaran McDermott ‪@cmavfc15

Follow

I'm not middle class and not pretending to care about Thatcher dying, so neither should a lot of you. Shameful

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13 from Birmingham, United Kingdom

*********************************************************

david wrench ‪@davidwrench

Follow

20yrs ago I'd have gone on the biggest piss up ever to celebrate Thatcher's death. Now I think I'll have a glass of milk.

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

**********************************************************

Joshua Hartshorn ‪@joshiehartshorn

Follow

R.I.P margaret thatcher even though she was a major bitch !

12:25 PM - 08 Apr 13

********************************************************

Danny Barrigan ‪@DannyBarrigan

Follow

There's only a few exceptions for me to not show respect for the dead, and she was top of the list. Party on her minute silence! ‪#Thatcher

12:31 PM - 08 Apr 13

*************************************

Thankfully, somebody made an observation:

Laura Leslie ‪@LauraLeslie23

Follow

Seems like a good chunk of those celebrating Thatcher's death are students who weren't even born when she was PM. Pathetic.

(A formal article will be posted later today concerning the death of Margaret Thatcher)

CALM DOWN, LEFTY, IT’S ONLY AN EASTER BUNNY

I was hoping that we could keep the Liberals in quarantine, locked away along the East and West Coast.  There, they could wave their multicolored flags and ban Coca-Cola bottles. 

THE WAR ON EASTER: secular progressives try to kick the 'Easter' out of the Easter Bunny

But it seems the Left Wing Militia has embarked upon westward expansion.  Now, in the Bible Belt heartland of Alabama, children cannot call the Easter Bunny the ‘Easter’ Bunny.    

In Heritage Elementary School in Madison, Alabama, Easter has been cancelled.  Heritage principal Lydia Davenport said "We had in the past a parent to question us about some of the things we do here at the schools."

So, because of a question, there will be no Easter, and possibly no eggs, either (although, the school was thinking about having the hunt with objects that have different shapes).  

Let me ask you this: when you go into a store, and you see an egg, chicken or chocolate, do you bawl out a barrel of tears?

I would like to know how these people have the guts to come up with such petty statements, and expect to be taken seriously.  

Of course, this is allowed to happen under the blanket of 'offence'.  Apparently these days, people have the 'right' not to be 'offended'.  

But what is 'offence', anyway?  Surely, you cannot have a free democracy and *not* have offence.  I, for example, am quite offended that the Easter Bunny cannot be called the 'Easter' Bunny, but who's fighting my corner?

I wonder if this was considered a substitute to the traditional Easter egg

It seems to me that popular logic goes something like this: you cannot offend a Left Wing-minded radical with 'traditional' things like the word 'Easter', but it's fine to offend Christian conservatives.  

What really gets me, though, is why we take this BS.  Who is 'Easter' offending in Alabama?  Practically *everyone* is Christian over there!  Oh, so are we living in a 'tyranny of the minority', then, where we must worry about a strange 10 or so percent of the population, who have revolutionary, Far Left views?  

The only way we can fight this war is if we united as Christians and take a formal stance on it.  This would never happen to, say, Jews, because they are united, they don't take nonsense like this; they have organisations working to ensure that their freedom is not infringed.  Likewise, nobody would dare criticise Muslims because everybody is scared stiff of getting on the wrong side of them.  Notice that whenever a silly thing happens in the West, like a cartoon of Mohammad being drawn, the Muslim world goes up in arms (why they do this I have no idea, it's not like you can sensor such an image in a free country, anyway).   

Now, I don't want Christians to be like that.  Christianity is very inclusive, and quite patient.  Remember, Jesus reached out to the Gentiles just as much as he did to his own people.  Christians won the Roman World not through force, but through persuasion.  

But I fear that if we don't become more defensive, and if we don't state the obvious - that Christians feel offended when things like this happen - we risk becoming more marginalised in society.  We're fast losing ground as secular revolutionaries infiltrate the education system and brainwash children so that they end up disliking Christianity (and, it seems, vote Democrat).  

I know the Easter Bunny is a secular symbol, but it still represents a Christian holiday - Easter.  Attacking it, and attacking eggs, can be equated to attacking Easter itself.  

The main reason behind this is to stop kids from getting enjoyment out of Christian holidays, so that they turn their back on them, and forget about them.  

The revolution will not occur in one day, but over many years.  If we don't do something now, there will come a time when Easter and Christianity will be a distant memory.  

Please support RightWingHome by SUBSCRIBING TO THE BLOG!

NEED HELP PAYING OFF YOUR STUDENT LOAN? DO A PORNO – TALES FROM THE SEEDY UNDERWORLD OF AMERICA’S UNIVERSITIES

I have been in full gear recently over the brainwashing of students in schools and universities.  I covered the story of the student who was suspended for refusing to stomp on the name ‘JESUS’, and the performance of a pro-homosexual play that mocks the Bible in a school in Massachusetts.  Now, something else has come my way that I have to share with you. 

SEX MANIAC Cindy Gallop wants to bring her seedy
beliefs to 'every college campus . . . in the world'

Students are having a tough time paying off their loans.  The situation has become so dire that the New York Federal Reserve is worried it might drag down the housing recovery. 

Thank heavens the University of Missouri has found an answer!  The University sponsored an hour-long talk last Wednesday, given by businesswoman Cindy Gallop.  In a hall where between 50 and 75 percent of the audience looked college-aged, Gallop asked students to join her ‘movement’: making porn videos and putting them on her website, ‘Make Love Not Porn.’ 

This so-called scheme is a great way, Gallop said, to make cash and pay of loans.  She tempted her prey by insisting that her movement was different from regular porn, which creates false, unrealistic impressions. 

But it became clear that Gallop is interested about more than just students paying off their loans – she wants a social revolution. 

‘I want to socialize sex,’ she declared.  She said her dream is to see her website become a porn-filled version of YouTube or Facebook. 

Doesn’t that make it a whole lot clearer to you?  She goes into a university, filled with the minds of tomorrow, and tries to convince them that porn is a good thing that should be encouraged.  Forget what’s ‘right’ and ‘wrong’.  Morals don’t exist anymore.  Do as you please (or, to be more specific, do as Gallop tells you). 

For that is the real meat of the matter.  By inviting her to talk, the university has attempted to steer their students towards this type of ‘work’.  They are presenting what was previously viewed as a dark underworld, as the gateway to the future. 

Strange, isn’t it?  I get people telling me that conservatives actively try to force their ‘way of life’ on others.  But when a bizarre ‘businesswoman’ walks onto a university stage and starts preaching the wonders of the porn industry to students, people turn a blind eye. 

What has gotten into universities and schools?  Can they not just *stop trying to change people’s social attitudes* and concentrate on educating, instead?  It seems to me that the Left are the ones constantly bringing social issues to the table.  Conservatives just want schools to shut up about sex, and let students decide for themselves what is right and wrong, with the help of their upbringing and personal beliefs.  There’s nothing extreme in the latter view. 

But don’t think this will be an isolated incident.  Gallop has tweeted:

‘We want @makelovenotporn on college campuses all over the US – and the world’.

The *world*, this Trotskyite has big ambitions.  On *every college campus*, working hard to pollute the minds of the young, who will be far away from home and therefore far away from the values of their upbringing, into accepting and embracing the Sexual Revolution. 

The Left has spoken.  Take warning.        






Please help RightWingHome by SUBSCRIBING TO THE BLOG!